I had the pleasure of joining Mariame Kaba, Roqayah Chamseddine and Kumars Salehi recently on the Delete Your Account Podcast. We talked about mutual aid, abolition, and more. Check it out! And enjoy this photo I took near Mount Baker this summer.
I had the pleasure of joining Mariame Kaba, Roqayah Chamseddine and Kumars Salehi recently on the Delete Your Account Podcast. We talked about mutual aid, abolition, and more. Check it out! And enjoy this photo I took near Mount Baker this summer.
I wrote an essay almost a decade ago based in reflections of my own experiences with overwork and burnout and the experience of people I was supporting in various organizations. I never published it, always thinking there is more work to do on it. I keep going back to it and realized now is as good a time as any to share the excerpt below that I hope is helpful to people who are being impacted by their own burnout and overwork or that of someone else.
Symptoms and Feelings of Overwork
Below I describe some of the symptoms and feelings that emerge with overwork. Some I experienced, and some I have heard others share. Many are very closely related and intertwined, but I have bulleted them for the ease of those who are more likely to skim than read.
These feelings and behaviors, of course, are reasonable results of the conditions under which we do our work. We are steeped in norms of capitalism and white supremacy that encourage us to compete, distrust, hoard, hide, disconnect, and only understand our value as based in how others see us. Our work is often under-resourced in important ways. Many of us come to the work because of our own experiences of violence or harm, and doing this work can be emotionally triggering and exhausting. We come to the work to heal ourselves and the world, but we often do the work in ways that further harm ourselves and impede our contribution to the resistance. In the context of professionalized non-profit social justice “careers” there is rarely room to process our triggering experiences or admit what we do not know how to navigate our roles in organizations. We also carry around fallback attitudes and behaviors that can undermine our principles, especially when we are stressed out and over capacity. These are the times when we might act out gender privilege, race privilege, class privilege, and forms of authority based in status distinctions like educational attainment. Many of the symptoms and behaviors listed in the bullets above can correlate to systems of privilege.
Addressing the Impacts of Overwork and Burnout in Organizations
When we are experiencing toxic feelings and acting out, or when someone in an organization we are involved with is struggling in this way, there are things we can do to address what is going on. One thing that helps is having a language for what is going on and realizing it is not about one person being “bad” or about whether the organization will be run by this person or others, but instead recognizing a set of dynamics that are impacting the group and impeding the mission of the organization and the principles of the person or people who are struggling. When we realize how common these dynamics are, sometimes we can move away from shaming and blaming ourselves and others and toward acknowledging what is going on and supporting change. It is often hard to confront another person about behavior that is harmful, and it is often hard to be confronted about harmful behavior and listen to what is being said. The ideas below do not change that, but they may help individuals or groups create concrete steps to address the problems. My own experiences with these issues are based in horizontal organizations that operate using consensus decisionmaking, so they may be most appropriate to those situations.[1] In my view, horizontal and consensus decisionmaking models are the most conducive to creating accountable, sustainable organizations that build lots of people’s leadership and have the capacity to address the causes of burnout.
Steps Toward Balance for Organizations
Bring more attention to addressing the organization’s internal problems. The organization cannot do its important work if it is falling apart inside, and it cannot do its work well if it is promising to do work it does not have the capacity to do. The internal concerns cannot wait until later because the giant need the organization exists to fill is probably not going to be reduced in the immediate future. This does not mean the organization’s work needs to stop, but it might mean calling a moratorium on new projects and commitments so that the problem does not worsen, and so that people can carve out time for working on the internal problems. Organizations working on internal problems might seek any of the following resources:
Make sure that new people who are entering the organization are being welcomed, given full background about what is going on, and clearly understand that they are being asked to fully participate in all decisions and ask any questions they need to in order to do so. Ensuring that everyone is getting access to what it takes to co-lead is essential to building leadership in more people. The organization and the people in it will be healthier if lots of people are leading, not just one or two.
Establish mechanisms to assess the workload and scale back. How many hours is each member working? Is it beyond what they are supposed to or can do healthfully? Did they actually track their hours for a week to make sure they are really aware of how much they are working? Assess the workload and scale back projects until it is under control. Create a moratorium on new projects until capacity expands. Enforce the moratorium—no one can unilaterally take on new work for the group or for themselves as a member of the group.
Focus on facilitation. How can the group’s meeting culture foster well-being, good will, connection between members? Eating together, having check-ins with interesting questions about people’s favorite foods, plants, movies, or politicizing moments may feel silly at first but makes a big difference. Bringing an attention to wellness into the organization means helping members be there as multi-dimensional people, rather than just as work machines. People need to build strong enough relationships to actually be able to talk about strong feelings and dynamics that come up in the work, or those dynamics will fester. The organization needs to build a culture that can cultivate supportive relationships.
Is everyone trained on how to facilitate meetings in ways that maximize the participation of all members of the group? Whenever there is a danger that just a few people will dominate an important conversation, use a go-around rather than having people volunteer to speak. Quieter members speaking can really change the dynamics.
As a group, recognize the conditions creating a culture of overwork. It is not one person’s fault, and everyone may be feeling the pressures. Have one or many facilitated discussions about the pressures and dynamics that lead to overwork or to individual’s dominating or disappearing. Create a shared language for the pressures the members may be under so they are easier to identify and address moving forward.
Include time and space for evaluation of how the group is operating regularly. This can include filling out questionnaires that allow people to provide feedback that may be hard to say in an open meeting, as well as having group discussions. Ask questions like: Do you feel clear about your role in the group? Is your workload manageable? Do you feel welcomed by and connected to the other members? What would improve your relationship to the other members and to the group as a whole? What kinds of support do you need to help you participate in this group? Are you noticing any dynamics that we could improve? What is going well in the group from your perspective? What are our greatest strengths?
Make sure that facilitation of meetings rotates, including agenda-making and other key leadership tasks.
Addressing Burnout and Overwork in Our Own Lives
In addition to creating organizational approaches to burnout, we can take action in our own lives when we recognize symptoms of overwork and burnout in ourselves. This requires us to work on changing behaviors that may be causing problems for us and for people around us. It also means we have to be willing to examine the root causes of our impulses to over-commit, to control, to overwork, and/or to disconnect. This is healing work aimed at helping us be well enough to enjoy our work, make sustained life-long contributions to the movements we care about, and receive the love and healing that is possible in communities of resistance. Above all, we must take a gentle approach to ourselves, avoiding judgment, recognizing the role of systemic violence in producing these responses in us, and patiently and humbly experimenting with new ways of being.
What the compulsive worker, over worker, control freak might need:
Working with Joy
It is not surprising that most of us have distorted relationships to the world of work, including activist work. The conditions and systems we live under make work coercive, create severe imbalances in who does what kinds of work for what kinds of compensation and recognition, and make work a matter of survival. Working to change the world is extremely hard because the conditions we are up against are severe, we lose people from our communities regularly, and we are battling monstrous apparatuses of violence. We cannot blame ourselves for having distorted relationships to our work, even though we understand that healing from distorted relationships to work is vital for our movements and for our own well-being and survival. We must be compassionate to ourselves and each other as we practice transforming our ways of working together.
One of the most significant sources of suffering people face the communities I live and work in, which often exacerbates other forms of scarcity and vulnerability, is isolation. When we do work together to build resistance movements, we often break this isolation and experience the healing of being heard by others about our experiences, of helping each other out with basic survival needs, and of sharing inspiring imagination and little experiments with building the world we want to live in. Our connection to each other is vital for us as we experience the grief, heartbreak and rage of living under brutal conditions, witnessing and experience harm and violence, and enduring setbacks in our work for change. We need each other badly to share what is hard about the overwhelming suffering in the world and the challenge of doing work for change in dangerous conditions. Even in the face of the pain that being awake to contemporary conditions causes, I believe that all of our work for change can be rooted in the comfort and joy of being connected to one another, accompanying one another, and sometimes being inspired together or by each other. Rather than our resistance being rooted in connection, often our organizations struggle with cultures of overwork based in capitalist, sexist and racist norms of scarcity, fear, competition, insecurity, and disconnection. Putting more attention toward how we work together, and what it means to be together in new ways that defy harmful norms, is essential to building the huge, strong, inspiring, joyful movements we need. Reflecting deeply about our own orientations toward work, what it feels like to participate in groups, what ideas we are carrying around about leadership and productivity, is crucial to building a practice of working from a place of connection, inspiration and joy. This means intentionally creating ways to practice a new relationship to work with each other, and diving into the psychic structures underlying our own distorted experiences of working and finding methods of healing that create new possibilities for how we can be in our work lives.
[1] Some useful resources for further learning about horizontal organizations and consensus decision making can be found here.
Sometimes I feel like it is out of style to be in and build organizations, compared to in prior eras of social movement work. When I was reading Katie Batza’s book Before AIDS, I was struck by one of the interviewees talking about in the 70’s how if you were interested in something or pissed about something, what you did was join a group and start a project like a newspaper or free clinic or childcare project or whatever. These days, I think we are more (mis)directed, if we are feeling up in arms over something, to only declare our views online or send a check to a non-profit, or maybe try to get a job at a non-profit. There is less participation in groups of all kinds, and our movements suffer from that. I’ve been trying to support conversations about people building mutual aid projects as a response to that dynamic. Supporting people to do that includes showing lots of awesome models of what people are starting–abortion funds, child care collectives, networks for housing people coming out of prison, court support projects, defense campaigns for criminalized people, bail and bond funds, and the like–but it also includes talking about how to build organizations where people work well together and can stick to it for a while instead of bursting into flames from conflict and harm. I wanted to make a post that has some of my favorite resources about that here because I find people asking me for this stuff more and more. Yay! Let’s build lots of awesome organizations and do amazing stuff together. Fight to win!
Tools I have written or co-written:
Tools I admire and recommend from other people and organizations:
I am involved with organizations that are always striving to support people growing more skills for making the world more aligned with values of justice and mutuality. We’re figuring out ways to make decisions together and share resources together and everything else it takes to build the social conditions we want. One part of this work is shedding the baggage of what we’re told in a racist, colonial, patriarchal society counts as “leadership.” That model is usually about individuality, competition, and domination. We are imagining and working to practice other ways of leading. I made a chart that I hope is a handy discussion tool in organizations that are thinking about how to live their values. I think it might go well paired with this chart I posted before about qualities of organizational cultures.
Leadership Qualities Supporting Mutuality vs. Hierarchy
Hierarchical Leadership Qualities |
Just and Accountable Leadership |
Successful by dominating others/being the decider |
Supports the growth of decision making processes that include everyone effected by the decision |
My way or the highway |
Wants to find out how others are doing, what they need or believe, what they want |
Self-promoting |
Eager to help many people develop leadership skills and share the spotlight |
Concerned with maintaining reputation, looking like “the best”, looking “right” |
Willing to admit mistakes |
Arrogant and grandiose |
Humble and dignified |
Good at talking and commanding |
Good at communicating: sharing and listening |
Wins others’ support through status, fear, or because others are climbing |
Wins support by being supportive and trustworthy |
Certain I’m right |
Open to influence and changing opinion |
Concerned about reputation of organization |
Concerned about organization’s material impact—does it alleviate suffering and increase justice? |
Fosters competition in the group |
Fosters compassion and a desire that no one is left out of the group |
Paranoid |
Generous and open to newcomers while holding boundaries |
Impulsive—plans change with my whims |
Holds steady to the groups’ decisions and purpose; Reliable |
Judgmental and exclusive |
Can tolerate people being a lot of different ways; sees potential in people to become part of the work for change and helps them develop skills and abilities |
Gets sense of self from status |
Self-accepting and steady in sense of self, so able to take risks or hold unpopular opinions |
Cares most what elites think |
Cares most what those on the bottom of hierarchies think and know; works to cultivate authenticity |
Needs to be center of attention |
Can take the risk of being seen, can step back so others can be seen |
Insensitive to others’ feelings |
Sensitive and responsive |
Tells people what to do |
Avoids advice-giving unless asked, instead interested in supporting people to make decisions that align with their values |
Seeks immediate gains, even if it means big compromises |
Sees the long view and holds to values |
Gives demeaning feedback or fails to give feedback or gossips instead of giving direct feedback |
Gives direct feedback in a compassionate way |
Defensive, closed to feedback |
Open to feedback, interested in how I impact others |
Controlling, micromanaging |
Can delegate, can ask for help, wants more people’s participation rather than more control |
Outcome-oriented |
Supports processes with integrity that lead to more people participating in decision-making |
Seeks and demands comfort |
Interested in what can be learned from discomfort, from changing roles or being out of place, from conditions transforming |
Ways to use this chart:
Yesterday, I did an interview with KUOW’s The Record about how Washington and many other jurisdictions are adding an “X” option as a gender marker on DMV ID. I talked about why we should, in addition to working to make it easier to change gender markers, work to eliminate gender markers from ID and oppose ID. I tried to tie this conversation about the X to opposition to law enforcement–policing and immigration enforcement–and all government and corporate surveillance.
Today I’m giving a webinar for Showing Up for Racial Justice at 5pm Pacific, 8pm Eastern. Join if you can, or they might have it available recorded after. Not sure.
Finally, I recently got to talk to Nick Venegoni on his Queer Spirit podcast about the self-help book for activists that I’ve been working on for about five years. I also want to recommend his interview with my sister, Lis Goldschmidt.
Things are rough right now. A lot of people are pissed, scared, and overwhelmed. What can we do? Does it make a difference to vote? To post on social media? This video is about mutual aid as a key strategy of resistance, survival, and mobilization.
Mutual aid projects are a form of political participation in which people take responsibility for caring for one another and changing political conditions, not just through symbolic acts or putting pressure on their representatives in government, but by actually building new social relations that are more survivable. Watch this video, and check out the mutual aid toolkit to start your own local projects.
For Pride 2019 and the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall rebellion, I wrote an op-ed for Out Magazine.
Op-ed: Honor Our Stonewall Veterans by Being Your Most Queer Militant Self
The Stonewall rebellion was not a “peaceful protest.” Queer and transgender people threw shoes and bottles at cops who routinely raided gay bars, beat and raped queer and trans people. Today, under the direction of a multi-million dollar Pride industry, Stonewall is celebrated with big parades where police, the military, banks, and politicians wave rainbow flags. In some cities, the cops roll out special rainbow-painted police cars. The radical acts of rage and disobedience against illegitimate authority that erupted at Stonewall are now reflected back as a story about “progress” in which the institutions that run our lives through coercion and violence claim to be “gay friendly.”
The Queer Trans War Ban toolkit has been updated for 2019 with new designs by JB Brager and Chris Vargas. Go and print them out and do outreach in at queer and trans events in your town this summer!
I had the opportunity to talk with Susan Stryker, J Mase III, Liz Coston and the host of 1A, Joshua Johnson recently. You can listen here.
Don’t miss this article by Raquel Willis, How Sylvia Rivera Created the Blueprint for Transgender Organizing.